The Rankings
»
law school and, by
definition, who becomes
the legal profession of the
future. The question is
how this influence plays
out, and the implications
it has for the legal profession.
From the standpoint of student selectivity, the U.S. News ranking
criteria are very simple:
• What percentage of
applicants was admitted?
(Lower is better.)
• What is the entering
class median LSAT score?
• What is the entering
class median undergraduate GPA?
Together, these factors
make up 25 percent of a
school’s overall ranking.
In contrast to the vague
reputational factors
also used in the ranking,
there is a certain pristine
quality to these criteria:
They’re numbers, they’re
verifiable, and within
limits, they’re relevant.
But, do they adequately
measure the criteria that
the practicing bar values?
And what sort of incentives do they create for
law school admissions
behavior?
These are important
questions, and they
warrant some special
attention to how these
ranking criteria affect the
“gate-keeping” function of
American law schools.
Looking at these criteria from the standpoint
of student selectivity, the
rankings reward a school
for four things: maximizing application volume,
minimizing offers of admission, maximizing the
median entering class
LSAT score, and maximizing the median entering
class undergraduate
grade point average.
The LSAT and GPA measures count the most.
The rankings take no
account of other admission factors. There is
nothing about where
degrees were earned;
nothing about grading
standards of schools or
programs; nothing about
whether applicants ever
spent time outside the
library as a student.
There is also nothing
about graduate work or
community service or
work experience; nothing about communication skills; nothing about
leadership, resilience or
passion.
So, if you’re a law
school in an academic
ecosystem that has completely assimilated the
rankings, how might
you structure your admissions process and decisions to take advantage
of the system?
To increase your
application volume, you
might spend more on recruitment and outreach
efforts. You might increase your travel budget
or encourage reluctant applicants to apply by waiving your application fees.
To lower the number of
offers you make (
remember, fewer offers mean
What Frims Want
The student selectivity ranking criteria are
relevant, but do they adequately measure
7
the elements that the practicing bar values?
higher selectivity), you
might try to pre-screen
applicants based on an
assessment of how likely
they are to accept